WalkUP Roslindale Snow Clearance Collaborative Version 7.2 – All Forces Deploy!

Boston Yeti Takes to the Streets during Winter Storm Marcus ...

Our old friend Boston Yeti is calling us out for the second time this winter! The reported snowfall total exceeds our 4″ (10cm), so we are again calling our forces out onto the snowy streets to clear bus stops, curb ramps, and key sidewalk segments for our neighbors. As has been the case, if you send us pix of the clearing you’ve done, we will send you back $10 in Rozzie Bucks as a reward and heartfelt thank you. Send pix to matthew.j.lawlor@nullgmail.com. Thanks!!!

Second in an occasional series: WUR Interviews Squares & Streets Roslindale Process Participants – Andrew Murray of Rozzidents for More Rozzidents

WalkUP Roslindale’s intent with this occasional series is to take a few minutes to have a chat with folks with whom we’re involved and/or aligned and hear more specifically from them about their perspectives, how they’ve come to participate in the Squares & Streets process, what they think about it, and where they hope it takes this part of our neighborhood.

Interview with Andrew Murray, Founder of Rozzidents for More Rozzidents

NOTE: This conversation has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

WUR: Andrew – Welcome to the WUR website and our occasional series on resident viewpoints vis-à-vis Squares + Streets in Roslindale. The first question I have is: what’s the organizing idea behind the movement you’ve started – Rozzidents for More Rozzidents? What should we know about it?

AM: Yeah, definitely. I want to answer that. I did want to say one thing just off the jump, just as a kind of a disclaimer. I work for the MBTA; in human resources. I’m helping programs to get better at hiring bus operators and all kinds of fun internships and apprenticeships. All that to say, I am not speaking on behalf of the T. I couldn’t remember if you and I had talked about that before.

WUR: Good to know and totally understand.

AM: So that’s my disclaimer. Now to answer your question, yeah, I think in a lot of ways my intention was just for it to kind of mean what it means to each individual and bring together what I think is a pretty big tent of people who are concerned either because it’s affecting them directly or because they care about their neighbors and they recognize the benefits of having folks of all walks of life be able to have access to our neighborhood and people who don’t view Roslindale as like some kind of scarce resource that there’s only so much to go around, right? And that actually like we’re made better the more that we’re willing to share this space and the more people that there are to frequent Roslindale the businesses that we like to frequent only makes us better and quirkier. And I recognize that’s different for different people, right? I don’t think everybody who wears a Rozzidents for More Rozzidents pin necessarily means you have to be like, yeah, let’s build eight story condos over the shops in the square where there’s no housing currently. It also can mean I am very much in favor of those kinds of things. And I recognize that other people might be in favor of other smaller scale changes. I think certainly I know that I am in favor of more of the traditional three and four story residential structure, uh, that is the makeup of the character of Roslindale. I think a lot of people maybe don’t recognize that that’s not something that you can just do anymore. Like there’s so many barriers to that. So, overall, my focus is on the big tent, on the things that align and allow for people to have nuanced opinions within that framework.

WUR: And how did you get involved in this? What was the spark for you?

ADM: You know, I think, honestly, I just got inspired. There was a group out of Minneapolis called Neighbors for More Neighbors that was a campaign that was for zoning reform there, which obviously… if you’re a housing advocate, Minneapolis is kind of one of the go-to success stories in terms of bringing forward wide sweeping zoning reform, allowing multifamily housing as of right in far more places than it was allowed before. And they’re starting to see the benefits in terms of rents declining in a time when they’re going up in so many other parts of the country, certainly places like Boston, where we don’t have those kinds of things. I’ve been really concerned, like a lot of people, with the rates of homelessness in the country and major cities in Boston and just sort of starting to be like, what are the underlying causes of that? There’s a great book called Homelessness is a Housing Problem. And very much, you know, that and other research, it all seems to indicate that the rental vacancy rate is the single biggest predictor of homelessness. And I think when you look at Boston, we have one of the lowest rental vacancy rates in the country. We don’t have as much visible homelessness here, which is a blessing and a curse in some ways. It’s a blessing because people have access to shelters that need it. Obviously, now, that system is being strained. But it does kind of make it out of sight, out of mind for people who say it makes the housing crisis a little bit less tangible than maybe in places like San Francisco, where it’s easier to point to it and say, hey, you guys are screwing something up here if you have this many people living this way. Whereas here we have more shelter space, which, again, I’m happy that we do. But I think it kind of puts it out of sight, out of mind for people. And now with the shelters being at capacity, I think we’re being forced to confront it head on in a way that we didn’t before.

WUR: Thanks for that answer and not surprised to hear about the Minneapolis example or that the rise in homelessness doesn’t add to the urgency of this moment. So, next question: how are you organizing? Is there any kind of formal organization around Rozzidents for More Rozzidents?

ADM: I honestly don’t know yet. I got inspired and just kind of came up with the slogan, right? Rozzidents for More Rozzidents, again, just based on that Neighbors for More Neighbors campaign. So, I kind of had an idea and worked with two great designers, Sam and Anna Nota here in Roslindale. They’re awesome. Definitely recommend them to anybody. They helped make my vision a reality. And we made these buttons and stickers that were based on the [Birch Street Plaza] mural or just kind of like a purple and green, like sort of like very natural, very natural Arboretum vibe. I just kind of wanted to have something that could be a way for people who probably don’t agree on every aspect of this, but to kind of have a way to show support for a lot of the zoning reform initiatives. I think dialogue is great. And I think everybody should have an opinion. I think everybody should voice their opinion. What concerns me when there’s things like squares and streets or zoning reform, it tends to be easier to organize when you’re against it or to, you know, if you go to a meeting and you like an idea, you might say, okay, that’s great. And then you kind of move on with your life. Whereas if you hate the idea, it’s kind of like, it becomes your like whole, like every day I have to get out and make sure people know. I just didn’t want people to get erased from the conversation when in reality, I think a large number of people see the need and the crisis we’re in and so are in favor of this and want to see it move forward and you sometimes hear either online or in meetings, like these calls that we have to slow this down. And that’s not really the case. You might not want it. And that’s again, your right as a citizen to advocate for that. But please don’t ignore the rest of us here that do. And we voted for a mayor for whom this was a central pillar of her campaign. She won convincingly and I think a lot of people support this and it’s just important to remind folks of that so we can have healthy discussions and hopefully participate in the squares and streets process, which I think if you’re willing to participate in the way that they’ve set it up, engage in their meetings, the way that they’re set up, I think there’s really been a lot of great opportunities to voice your opinion and get some insight. I know that I have thrown ideas out there that I’m sure other folks have as well that are showing up in the draft plan and I think that’s really cool. I also really like the overall mission of simplifying the zoning code and setting it up in a way where, like, let’s allow things just to be built as needed, right? Or letting businesses move in to serve the needs or demands of the community as needed rather than like, I think in the past, we’ve made the mistake of over planning and over dictating what can go where. If there were more opportunities for businesses, more spaces available for them to rent, I don’t think we would be seeing so many businesses facing the rent pressure that they’re facing, just like housing. So I think one of the things I really like is the idea that we’re going to enable more space to be used for both commercial and housing. And I think that’s great. I mean, I think that’s step one of any plan to fight displacement. I think that that has to be step one. So I’m really excited about that part of it. I certainly think that things need to go further in terms of more general reform, right? Like I think you should be able to build the kind of multifamily housing that for decades we were able to either build or convert and that allowed immigrants, working class families, middle-class families an opportunity to participate in land ownership and acquiring property, acquiring a home rather than what it is now, which is sort of this inflated Ponzi scheme to, you know, if your house property value isn’t going up at better than a stock index, then, you know, it was a bad investment. Roslindale is great because it’s got a great amount of diversity, a lot of folks have different incomes, but it’s also pretty segregated, so I’d like to see more multi-family housing allowed in parts of Roslindale that maybe haven’t been as accessible to everybody in the past.

WUR: Fully agree. If Squares + Streets succeeds in bringing more housing to the part of the neighborhood that has the most accessible amenities, that’s a win-win for sure. I’ll also note here that the rest of the country plans and rezones much more regularly than we do. And I hope that what we do is, when we get this done, that we don’t just put it in a box for 15 years and act like the revised regulation is perfect. It needs to be every three to five years that we look at this again. Did we get the results we want? What do we want to do more or less of? And that’s a big ask. The city needs to set itself up to do that and then do it.

ADM: I really appreciate that. I think that’s been a learning experience for me. I grew up in Nashville, Tennessee, which has its own issues, but it’s a city that’s the same population as Boston spread across 10 times as much space. And it has a zoning code that’s like one 10th the size, right? Boston’s zoning is super complicated. And certainly while I might not always agree, I do sympathize with people who have just gotten used to things a certain way. One thing that was really eye-opening for me that a friend in the neighborhood pointed out is that for so many people of a certain age, activism, standing up for community meant, like, fighting against the Southwest Expressway, right? That would have been where the Southwest Corridor Park is now. That would have been certainly a disaster, you know, to somebody like me who wants more walkability, biking, transit, But that’s the central idea, that you had to fight to stop things in order to be a successful advocate. And then now it’s switching gears to say actually we should be for change and new stuff too, to help combat the real problems we’re facing. And that’s hard. For example, I’ve heard people in good faith equate this zoning process to the Southwest expressway, even though to me, they are totally different ends of the spectrum.

WUR: OK. Last question. From your perspective, what do you want to see Squares + Streets do in Roslindale? What would a positive outcome look like?

ADM: I think for me, just allowing as much housing to be built as there’s demand for and of different varieties. I don’t only want, five over one condos or whatever. I want people that can afford those units to have the opportunity to go and buy them because I’d rather them do that than drive up the sale price for a hundred year old house or be competing with a working-class family to rent a naturally occurring affordable housing unit, know what I mean? I’d also like to see the city supporting and creating more opportunities for subsidized, government-funded housing that’s mixed with market-rate housing.

WUR: In closing, tell us a bit about yourself, whatever you think someone should know.

AM: Yeah, I mentioned I grew up in Nashville. I came to Boston when I was 18 for college. I think like a lot of teenagers, I was just like, I want to be the opposite of wherever I was, right? And I think it just like dumb luck that I landed in such a great place to live with Boston. It’s been such an amazing place for me. I feel so lucky every day that I can get around without needing to drive everywhere. My wife and I, we own one car between the two of us. I love that I can get to work very easily either on the Orange Line or by biking. I work downtown. I find there’s a lot of things in the city that I can access with very little inconvenience without needing a car. Sometimes it’s flat out better or faster to just bike or take the Orange Line. So, you know, I think we have challenges. We need better bike infrastructure. The T needs to keep operating better. We need to keep improving service, all those things. But the glass is also half full and we’re very lucky to have access to these things. They can support far more people even right now, just as they are, I think.

Three Good News Items for your Tuesday!

We sometimes have the opportunity to write about actual newsy items happening around our neighborhood and today is such a day as we have 3 good ones for everyone:

  • Sweeties has landed!

We were all sad to see Stephanie Ortiz move out of the area and Jimmie’s exit the square’s retail scene, but our sadness is now somewhat lessened by the arrival of their successors at 46 Corinth Street – Sweeties and their new “delightfully social” ice cream/fruit mix-ins concept. They’ve soft opened in the last few days. Go on down and give them a try. You won’t be disappointed!

  • Rozzidents for More Rozzidents warms our hearts


As part of the pro-housing movement ourselves, we are greatly encouraged by the emergence of “Rozzidents for More Rozzidents” as part of the advocacy ecosystem here in Roslindale. On their facebook page, they describe themselves as “A group advocating for secure, abundant, and affordable housing in Roslindale, Boston, and beyond.” We couldn’t agree more with these sentiments and their buttons and stickers are supercool.

  • We’re tabling! This Saturday – 8 June 2024! At the Farmers Market!

That’s right. Come find us anytime between 9:00 am and 1:30 pm this Saturday in Adams Park (we think; either there or Birch Plaza). We’ll be there with our table, banner, street chalk, and goodies, ready to talk about our mission, activities, and what’s next. Hope to see you there!

Another installment of Squares + Streets Roslindale News – Foundational Zones Adopted by Zoning Commission, Upcoming Zoning Meeting on 24 April 2024, and AHMA’s initial analysis online

Three things to know:

  1. Squares + Streets Foundational Zones Adopted by Zoning CommissionThis past Wednesday, 17 April 2024, saw the Boston Zoning Commission, by a vote of 7-1, adopt the full set of S+S foundational zones – S-0 through S-5 – into the Boston Zoning Code as Article 26, along with a broad range of other modifications to the code. WalkUP Roslindale submitted its own comment letter and your correspondent testified in favor at the hearing, along with District 5 Councilor Enrique Pepen, among others supportive of the proposal. Congratulations and thanks to the city planning line staff who worked so hard to get these building blocks roughed into shape and to Director of Planning Aimee Chambers, to BPDA Director Arthur Jemison, and to Mayor Michelle Wu for supporting this work and leading the effort to get the initial step all the way over the line. Now, we turn in true earnest to the small area planning process here in Roslindale Square to figure out how best to land these zones within a framework of city policies, programs, and ordinances that will make our neighborhood center a better functioning, more welcoming place.
  2. Squares + Streets Upcoming Meeting THIS WEEKZoning Workshop, 6 pm on 24 April 2024, Roslindale Community Center (corner Cummins & Washington). This is going to be an in-person meeting. If you’re reading this, we encourage you to attend for as much of the meeting as possible. BPDA staff describe the agenda and intent as follows: At this workshop, community members will be introduced to zoning as a tool that guides development and will discuss zoning through a community development mindset. The workshop will start with a walkthrough of how zoning works in Boston with a focus on existing zoning regulations in Roslindale Square and proposed zoning in Squares + Streets zoning districts as context. The second half of the workshop will be an interactive, facilitated activity to think about how proposals for community development projects would have to interact with existing zoning regulations in Roslindale Square. By the end of the workshop, community members will have engaged in initial conversations about community development goals that will support future engagement conversations on how the mapping of Squares + Streets zoning districts can support those goals.
  3. AHMA gets the ball rolling on S+S buildout scenarios – Our friends over at Abundant Housing Massachusetts (AHMA), the Commonwealth-wide pro-housing organization, recently released their preliminary analysis of the likely range of new residential units that could result from Squares + Streets in Roslindale Square. Briefly stated, AHMA’s research projects that Roslindale’s Squares + Streets rezoning could result, over the next decade, in 300 to 1700 new residential units. That is a very broad range indeed. AHMA’s projections are presented in accessible PDFs and an interactive online tool. The tool allows users to adjust assumptions and explore rezoning’s impacts on housing production, property tax revenue, and zoning nonconformance. AHMA have also prepared a detailed video walkthrough for navigating the PDFs and interactive tool. AHMA’s analysis identifies underutilized sites on lots larger than 6,000 sq. ft. that are vacant or have older, low-rise buildings, and assumes 25-33% (i.e., up to a third) of these sites will redevelop over 10 years. The most minimal rezoning scenario only studies the transformation of commercial areas into mixed-used districts. By applying the newly adopted S2 District, which permits buildings up to five stories, this could increase Roslindale’s housing stock by 2.5% and Hyde Park’s by 5.7%. The top-of-the-range abundance rezoning scenario explores the potential for mid-to-high density housing and mixed-use projects across the entire Squares + Streets study area. By applying a mix of S2 and S3 Districts, which permit buildings up to seven stories, this could increase Roslindale’s housing stock by 13.4% and Hyde Park’s by 24.4%. More details on the methodology can be found in the PDFs and video walkthrough.AHMA have indicated that they have three goals in releasing these initial housing projections and the accompanying tools:
    • Education – AHMA wants to increase public understanding of how zoning actually translates into building more homes. The better people understand how this process works, the better the chances we can engage in collaborative community planning.
    • Advocacy – AHMA supports the abundance rezoning scenario and believes Roslindale and Cleary Squares can thoughtfully introduce far more homes while maintaining existing residents’ quality of life.
    • Framing the discussion AHMA recognizes that the minimal rezoning scenario fails to adequately address the housing needs in Roslindale and Cleary Squares, but includes it as a plausible lower bound for community discussions.

Three thoughts on Squares + Streets as we get underway in Roslindale Square

NOTE: The following are entirely the personal thoughts of the poster, not the entire organization or even the Board of Directors of WalkUP Roslindale. – mjl

There is no question that the manner in which Boston Planning & Development Agency (BPDA) leadership and staff are going about the Squares + Streets small area planning process is a departure in significant ways from past practice and that this departure, which is significant, has led to some understandable confusion among those who most closely follow the city’s planning and development processes. Herewith, three thoughts about where we find ourselves at this moment:

  1. Floating Zones are a new thing in this city – This has probably been the most difficult conceptual issue for everyone to get used to. I’m not aware of any prior examples of the Boston Zoning Code containing a set of base zoning districts that aren’t mapped anywhere upon their adoption by the Zoning Commission, but that is exactly what is being done with Squares + Streets. This is not unusual outside of Boston – the concept of floating zones has been around in planning and zoning circles for decades. The new S-zones – S-0 through S-5 – that are slated for a vote on April 17, 2024, will go into Article 26 of the code and will comprise, upon their adoption, only a suite of potential base zones to be deployed later. Each area undergoing the Squares + Streets small area planning process is expected to ultimately bring a selection of these zones down to the ground in the configuration that their process says makes the most sense. This is worth repeating – no part of Roslindale is going to be rezoned as part of the text amendments under consideration next month. Instead, rezoning for a portion of Roslindale Square will only occur after the small area planning process, which is just now getting underway in earnest, has run its course and a multi-faceted plan, of which targeted rezoning is expected to be a part, is adopted by the BPDA.
  2. Planning Processes, at any scale, of 6 to 9 months are, you guessed it, new as well for Boston – This is largely because planning processes leading to rezoning in this city have usually covered much larger areas, typically entire neighborhoods, as part of the so-called “base code” or the original neighborhood zoning article efforts of prior decades or the newer plans such as Plan East Boson and Plan Mattapan. Full neighborhood-wide planning processes like the latter two have taken several years. By being focused about the areas to be examined, visioned, and then rezoned, the idea is to be able to move with the speed and urgency that the ongoing housing crisis demands. And let’s be clear that the housing crisis truly is a crisis, an emergency even, and the Mayor recognizes that
  3. Finally, truly usable As-of-Right Zoning is entirely new – Underzoning with the intent of pulling almost everything that happens into a discretionary approval process has a long, troubling history here in Boston, across the commonwealth, and frankly around the country. If you want to learn more about how this has worked over several decades, I’d suggest taking a look at the work that Amy Dain at the Boston Indicators project has been doing for many years on the deeply exclusionary effects this phenomenon has had in the Boston region and the large share of responsibility it bears for the accompanying housing crisis. The Mayor has long been explicit about her concerns that so much of what actually gets built or expanded in this city goes through a discretionary, politically-driven zoning relief process, particularly before the Board of Appeal. She is hardly the first person to recognize and point this out, but she is the first mayor I’ve seen since I moved to Roslindale almost 24 years ago who is trying to do something about it. This is a problem that affects every part of the code. It’s why so much of what local neighborhood groups discuss has to do with all manner of development proposals ranging from a new multifamily building replacing a largely defunct row of single-story retail down the street to an expansion of their across-the-street neighbor’s house to add a modest amount of living space in their attic. I directly lived through and supported both of these examples in my own neighborhood. Most everyone knows that this is no way to run development review in 2024. But it’s still the day-to-day reality, even as Squares + Streets is the first meaningful attempt being made by the city to move away from this in a serious way on what many think is a sensible place to start – allowing multifamily residential above ground floor commercial/retail uses “as-of-right” in our city’s neighborhood centers without forcing the developers of that housing to engage in a lengthy, costly, and risky discretionary review process to do what we say we want them to do. This puts a significant amount of pressure on getting not only the zoning but also the full suite of implementation components of the small area planning process right.

All of the foregoing said, it’s worth reiterating the concerns and objectives that the WalkUP Roslindale comment and support letter from late January raised. The full letter can be reviewed here, but if anyone wants to know where we’re coming from as we take part in the Roslindale Squares + Streets process, the key concepts are as follows:

  • Utilize Objective Criteria. BPDA staff must use objective criteria to map out the small area plans for Roslindale Square and other neighborhood centers. These criteria should include, but not necessarily be limited to: proximity to transit (both rail and bus), walkability, existing conditions, and anticipation of growth. It is crucial that easily understandable and transparent criteria are utilized to plan and zone these small plan areas to create the conditions for future growth and enhanced density and walkability.
  • Limit Conditional Uses. We recommend that the BPDA reduce the number of conditional uses imposed throughout the new, proposed zoning. While conditional uses have a place in some situations, the proposed zoning can and should go further to make many of these conditional uses allowed by right. We know from experience in Roslindale that conditional uses can bog down applicants and small business owners in unnecessary bureaucracy that delay new housing and new businesses and raise the associated costs.
  • Use Existing Conditions as the Floor. In Roslindale, the vast majority of lots are existing non-conforming. That is to say, the lots were initially developed with small lot sizes, minimal setbacks, and similar characteristics, but made retroactively nonconforming by later downzoning. This situation means almost any development, whether new construction or simple exterior renovations, will require zoning variances. At a minimum, the new zoning should restore existing lots to legal status and remove the requirement of variances to do basic work and simple additions to them. [SPECIFIC MJL NOTE: It is worth pausing on this point, which has been raised above as well. It has been a curious, but entirely consistent feature of zoning in Boston for several decades that almost everything is zoned for something other than what it actually is on the ground. As just on example, my house sits on a 4400 square foot lot in a 2F-5000 residential zoning district on which the first permitted unit requires at least 5000 SF of lot area. In other words, in a fit of what can only be described as bizarre self-loathing, the city saw fit, in 2008 mind you, to zone my property and the property of almost all of my neighbors (whose lots are also less than 5000 SF in area) as non-conforming. In other other words, our current zoning almost uniformly acts like what we have today, in the neighborhood we all say we love, is wrong and not acceptable. I am not exaggerating.]
  • Address Displacement. Displacement is inevitably most prevalent when the status quo is maintained. If no new residential or commercial space is built, steadily increasing demand for both guarantees that residents (renters, aspiring homeowners, and business owners) will be priced out. That said, changes that increase permissible commercial and residential density will result in new construction and potentially higher rents if anti-displacement measures are not considered from the outset. We encourage the BPDA to proactively plan for this in small plan areas under the new zoning and create incentives for existing property owners to keep rents reasonable through property tax abatements and other measures, such as providing current commercial tenants the right of first refusal to return to the space at issue.
  • Engage All Stakeholders. As an organization of neighborhood residents and local business owners, we firmly believe in public feedback and input into planning and zoning decision-making. At the same time, we know that no one group, including our own, can speak for an entire neighborhood, never mind an entire city. We have been impressed by the outreach conducted by BPDA staff to date and urge its continuation as the process moves forward from adopting the proposed set of floating zones to undertaking the small area plans. It is crucial that staff continue to actively reach out to stakeholders where they are. It is well documented that evening meetings are difficult for individuals with small children, evening jobs, and other life commitments to attend, for example. We hope to continue to see opportunities for feedback at pop up events, the Roslindale Farmers’ Markets,  on transit platforms and bus stops, and at community activities where people naturally congregate and deserve an opportunity to be heard.

Bussey Street Renaming Initiative – Community Input Solicited

Along with a group of neighborhood residents and stakeholders, WalkUP Roslindale Board member Steve Gag has been involved over the last several months in a meaningful initiative to change the name of Bussey Street, the street that bisects the Arnold Arboretum, to honor an individual worthy of recognition in accord with the present-day values of the Jamaica Plain and Roslindale communities. That group is now seeking broader community input on potential new names for the street that will provide valuable information and advice to the two street abutters – the Arboretum/Harvard and the Parks Department/City of Boston – who are empowered to make the formal request for the name change.

We hope that folks will read this document from the initiative that provides more background on what this is all about, along with biographies of the five potential new names for the street, and will submit input by rating each of the candidates. In the document is a link to the form to fill out and submit a rating. Respondents have until April 27 to submit the form.

Finally, there will be a virtual community meeting on the evening of April 11 to learn more about the candidates and the renaming process.  The linked document includes a contact email address for those interested in attending the meeting.

Public Meeting 5 Days Right Ahead – Thursday, 9 March 2023 – Return of 4198 Washington Street

As those who follow this weblog know, WalkUP Roslindale followed this project closely through the public process that unfortunately resulted in an effective ZBA denial in the fall of 2021. (See 2 of our posts below). Now, the owners of the property are thankfully back with a renewed push on redevelopment of this 8,982 square foot site at 4198 – 4206 Washington Street in Roslindale Square. Physically, their proposal hasn’t changed: in place of the existing one-story retail structure, it still calls for construction of a new five (5)-story, mixed-use building containing approximately thirty-one (31) residential units, approximately 6,800 square feet of retail/community theater space, and approximately thirty-eight (38) bicycle storage spaces. The sole change, and it is significant, is that the owners have increased the share of income-restricted residential units from 42% to 61%, such that 19 of the 31 units are committed to be affordable to households earning between 60% and 100% of area median income. Not only is this substantively good on its own and makes an already great project that much better, it is also puts the project into the category of affordable residential developments that the Mayor’s Affordable Housing Executive Order of last fall expressly wants to advance more quickly and efficiently in light of the long-standing housing crisis in our city. In other words, this is exactly the kind of project that the Wu Administration wants to see a lot more of. Its time has come.

You can visit the project’s page on the BPDA website for more information. Most importantly, you can find information on the upcoming public meeting over zoom that is scheduled for this coming Thursday, 9 March 2023, at 6:00 pm. We urge supporters of this worthy proposal to attend the meeting and make your voices heard in support. You can register here.

4198 Washington Street Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Project Rejected by Zoning Board of Appeal Due to Lack of Parking

 

WalkUP Roslindale comment letter on 4198 Washington Street

 

World Day of Remembrance for Victims of Traffic Crashes – 20 November 2022

With apologies for the late amplification here: Today is a particular day to remember all of those who have died or been seriously injured on streets and roads all across the world, including here in Massachusetts. The MA Vision Zero Coalition has a webpage up about events here in Boston and elsewhere around the commonwealth. Whatever we’re actually able to do today to help remember, let’s make sure we stay committed to doing everything we can to make our streets and roads safer and more welcoming for everyone who uses them.